Implementing Healthcare Interoperability: Overcoming the Challenges of Change Management and Adoption

Implementing healthcare interoperability often feels like an uphill battle. New systems need to be integrated into already complex workflows, organizational priorities compete for limited resources, and clinical teams – already stretched thin – can be resistant to yet another change. 

However, overcoming healthcare interoperability challenges and successfully adopting new systems is essential for improving patient safety, care coordination, and clinical workflows – and it’s entirely within reach. While the technical aspects of connecting systems are important, they're only half the equation. The real determinants of success are organizational readiness and effective change management. 

In this article, we’ll discuss the common challenges of healthcare interoperability adoption and provide a practical framework for overcoming them.

‍

Why Interoperability Feels “Hard” for Healthcare Organizations

A recent report by MIT Technology Review Insights that surveyed 300 global healthcare executives found that 91% of respondents agree interoperability is a challenge. 

The technical complexity alone can feel overwhelming: legacy systems that weren't designed to communicate, varying data standards across vendors, and the sheer volume of integration points required to achieve true interoperability. Add to this the financial and resource constraints that healthcare organizations face daily, and it’s clear why implementing interoperability feels difficult to achieve. 

While these barriers may feel challenging, they're common and solvable with the right framework and strategic approach.

‍

Department and institutional silos

Research shows that the lack of clear governance structures within health information exchange (HIE) networks is a challenge for many organizations. Competing priorities and unclear data ownership cause gridlock, with different facilities protecting their own systems and data rather than working toward a unified approach. 

This can also be a challenge within a single organization. Different departments may use different software tools that don't communicate with each other, further contributing to departmental and institutional silos. Emergency departments might use one system for patient tracking, while radiology uses another for imaging, and pharmacy operates on yet another platform. The result is fragmented patient data that requires manual effort to reconcile, increasing the risk of errors and delaying care decisions.

It's important to establish shared governance frameworks and encourage cross-department collaboration early on in the interoperability process. This means bringing stakeholders together to define common goals, establish data standards, and create clear policies around data access and ownership. Unifying clinical tools helps streamline data exchange and reduce the number of tools used across departments, simplifying training and reducing the cognitive load on staff. This will ultimately help improve interoperability and create a more cohesive care environment.

‍

Leadership buy-in

Healthcare leadership is often up against competing priorities – financial constraints, staffing and resourcing, and compliance challenges are just a few examples. Shifting priorities or changes in leadership can derail any progress made toward interoperability, especially when initiatives lose momentum during transitions or when short-term pressures take precedence over long-term infrastructure investments. Without sustained executive commitment, interoperability projects often get deprioritized or underfunded, leading to incomplete implementations that fail to deliver meaningful value.

To address this challenge, executive sponsorship and visibility is essential. Leaders need to understand that interoperability isn't just an IT initiative – it's a strategic investment that directly impacts patient outcomes, operational efficiency, and organizational resilience. Interoperability can help address many of the competing priorities leaders face. As an example, improved communication between departments can reduce adverse events, speed up response times, and alleviate clinician burnout by eliminating redundant data entry and streamlining workflows. When executives champion interoperability as a solution to these pressing challenges rather than another burden, it becomes easier to maintain momentum and secure ongoing resources. 

‍

Stakeholder alignment

Despite its technical dimensions, interoperability is something that impacts every department on the clinical team – from IT and clinicians to compliance and administration. Getting department stakeholders not only involved in interoperability, but aligned on the objectives is critical as  misalignment can slow everything down.

Conduct early stakeholder engagement to identify all affected departments and their specific concerns, then create forums for open dialogue and continuous feedback loops. This isn't a one-time exercise – ongoing and continuous discussion and alignment is important, even after integration and initial adoption. As workflows evolve and new challenges emerge, maintaining regular touchpoints ensures that the interoperability infrastructure continues to serve everyone's needs and that small issues don't escalate into major roadblocks.

‍

Clinical team adoption

Improving interoperability often means introducing new tools to clinical workflows. However, clinical staff may be resistant to new tools due to time constraints, change fatigue, or usability. Research has shown that adapting and implementing new technology can be one of the main contributors of administrative burden. Even well-intentioned interoperability initiatives can fail if they don't account for the reality of the clinical environment and the cognitive load already placed on healthcare providers.

To help healthcare providers adopt a new platform, it's important to keep ease-of-use in mind from the very beginning. This means involving clinicians in the design and selection process, conducting usability testing with actual end users, and prioritizing intuitive interfaces that minimize steps and cognitive burden. 

Consider not only the platform’s ease of use, but also the level of support it offers. Platforms like Hypercare, for example, offer hands-on support during rollout, including dedicated training sessions and responsive technical support. It’s also important to make it easy for staff to provide feedback and demonstrate quick wins early in the adoption process to build confidence and momentum. 

‍

A Practical Framework for Interoperability Change Management 

Achieving meaningful interoperability doesn't have to be overwhelming. While the challenges are real, there's a clear roadmap to make adoption easier and sustainable. 

The following interoperability implementation guide breaks down the process into manageable steps that healthcare organizations of any size can follow, helping clinical teams move from abstract goals to concrete outcomes.

‍

1. Start with a clear vision and leadership commitment

Before diving into technology selection or implementation details, take the time to articulate what success looks like for your organization. This could be any number of outcomes, including: 

• Faster communication between departments 
• Reduced duplication of diagnostic tests
• Better care coordination across the continuum

Defining these concrete outcomes early creates a north star that keeps everyone aligned when challenges inevitably arise.

Equally important is assigning clear ownership. Identify who's accountable not just for the initial implementation, but for driving and maintaining adoption over the long term. This accountability shouldn't rest solely with IT – it requires a cross-functional leader or committee with the authority to make decisions and remove barriers. 

Executive sponsorship and visible, consistent leadership throughout implementation is essential. Leaders should communicate regularly about progress, celebrate wins (even small ones), and share lessons learned transparently. When teams see that leadership is genuinely committed and engaged, it signals that this initiative matters and won't be abandoned at the first obstacle.

‍

2. Engage stakeholders early and often

Interoperability isn't just a technical project – it's an organizational initiative that touches every corner of your institution. That's why it's critical to include representatives from every role affected by new workflows right from the start. Bring administrators, technical teams, clinicians, compliance officers, and operational staff to the table early in the planning process. Each group brings unique insights about how work actually gets done, where the pain points are, and what guardrails need to be in place. Beyond broad representation, it’s important to rally everyone around a shared outcome and vision. This helps stakeholders understand not just what's changing, but why it matters to them specifically and to patient care broadly.

Additionally, create change champions at both clinical and operational levels. These are individuals who understand the vision, believe in its value, and can advocate for adoption among their peers. These champions serve as bridges between leadership and frontline staff, answering questions, troubleshooting concerns, and modeling successful use of new tools. 

‍

3. Map and simplify workflows before implementation

One mistake organizations can make is implementing interoperability solutions without truly understanding existing workflows. Before introducing any new technology, take time to document how data, communication, and tasks currently flow through your organization. Shadow clinicians and staff, map out handoff processes, and identify where information gets lost or duplicated. This groundwork is invaluable as it reveals the specific friction points that interoperability should solve, not add to.

Use these insights to evaluate potential solutions critically. The goal isn’t just to digitize existing processes or add another layer of technology, it’s to genuinely make work easier and more efficient. Choose solutions that enhance, not complicate, existing workflows. If a new tool requires three extra clicks to accomplish what used to take one, or if it introduces a parallel system that clinicians must check in addition to their existing ones, it’s not truly solving the problem. The best interoperability solutions should feel intuitive and reduce cognitive burden, seamlessly fitting into the natural flow of clinical work.

‍

4. Pilot and iterate before scaling

If you don’t want to roll out interoperability changes across your entire organization all at once, consider running a pilot phase. Start small with one department, one workflow, or one specific use case where the value proposition is clearest and the stakeholders are most engaged. This pilot approach allows you to test assumptions, identify unexpected challenges, and refine your implementation in a controlled environment where mistakes are less costly.

During the pilot phase, gather measurable feedback across multiple facets. This can include: 

• Tracking adoption rates
• Collecting user satisfaction scores
• Measuring time saved
• Documenting changes in clinical outcomes or operational metrics

These data points are critical as they tell you what's working, what needs adjustment, and whether the actions are delivering on the promised value. Be prepared to iterate based on what you learn. Sometimes the solution needs tweaking, sometimes the training approach needs revision, and sometimes workflows need further simplification. When you can point to real results from the pilot, the case for expansion becomes much easier to make. 

Keep in mind that too many pilot programs can potentially have a negative impact on clinical operations. When multiple programs are introduced – whether simultaneously or in quick succession – messaging may be fragmented and clinicians can experience change fatigue. To prevent this, limit the number of pilots and provide clear communication throughout the process. 

‍

5. Prioritize training, support, and communication

Even the most intuitive interoperability solution requires thoughtful training and support. Offer role-specific training that fits busy clinical schedules. These can be brief, focused sessions that respect people's time and address their specific needs. For example, emergency department physicians need different training than inpatient nurses, who need different training than administrative staff. A one-size-fits-all approach rarely works in healthcare's diverse environment.

Make your training practical and relevant by using real examples that show how interoperability reduces daily friction. Instead of abstract feature demonstrations, walk through actual scenarios. For example, “Here's how you'll access lab results from the referring facility during patient intake” or “This is how handoff communication happens when transferring a patient to the ICU.” When clinicians can immediately see how a tool solves problems they face every day, adoption has a better chance of accelerating.

Post launch, monitor the progress of the new systems within clinical workflows. It’s important to keep a pulse on how staff is using the tools to understand if training and communication has been effective. Additionally, keep feedback channels open and create multiple ways for users to report issues, ask questions, and suggest improvements. This ongoing dialogue signals that you value users’ experience and are committed to continuous improvement, not just a one-time implementation.

‍

6. Celebrate early wins and share outcomes

Change fatigue is real in healthcare, and momentum can easily falter if people don’t see tangible results. Combat this by celebrating early wins and communicating progress transparently. Even small victories matter, whether that’s faster response times between departments, reduced duplicate orders, improved handoff communication, or positive feedback from a pilot group. 

Share these wins widely and specifically, using concrete metrics to quantify and communicate the impact. For example, “Since implementing interoperability in the cardiology department, handoff times have decreased by 23%” or “Clinicians report saving an average of 15 minutes per shift on documentation.” These concrete numbers make the value real and tangible.

‍

Making Interoperability Easier with the Right Partner

The framework outlined above works best when supported by technology designed specifically for the realities of clinical settings. This is where choosing the right platform becomes critical – not just for its technical capabilities, but for how well it addresses the human and organizational challenges that make interoperability adoption difficult.

For example, Hypercare's unified clinical communication platform was built with these challenges in mind. Rather than forcing healthcare teams to adapt their workflows to fit the technology, Hypercare can integrate seamlessly with a range of existing systems and clinical routines. The platform connects secure messaging, scheduling, on-call management, and code activations into a single interface, eliminating the need for clinicians to toggle between multiple applications or search for information across disconnected systems. This unified approach directly addresses the departmental silos and workflow friction that often derail interoperability efforts.

Beyond technology, it’s also important to choose a partner that can offer hands-on training and ongoing support to help accelerate adoption after deployment. As an example, Hypercare provided hands-on training to 2,000 users at Health Sciences North (HSN) when the hospital replaced its legacy pager system with clinical messaging. After a successful pilot with the Emergency Department and a one-week training program administered by Hypercare, 70% of eligible users were active within a month of implementation. 

“We could really rely on the Hypercare team to fill in those knowledge gaps that we obviously didn't have at the beginning of the project,” said Lindsay Cooper, Digital Health Project Manager at HSN. 

‍

Key Takeaways for Healthcare Leaders

Interoperability adoption is achievable when organizations approach it with thoughtful planning, committed leadership, and user-centered design that prioritizes the needs of the people who will use these systems every day. When healthcare leaders recognize these organizational and human-centered barriers as normal parts of the change process rather than insurmountable obstacles, they can address them proactively with the frameworks and strategies outlined.

With the right change management strategies, supportive leadership, and platforms designed for real-world clinical environments, healthcare teams can move beyond fragmented communication and data silos to achieve what every organization ultimately strives for: safer, faster, and more connected care that improves outcomes for patients and reduces burden for the teams caring for them. To explore Hypercare's clinical communication platform and learn more about its interoperable solutions, book a demo below.