Do hospitals still use pagers in 2026?

For decades, hospital pagers were synonymous with healthcare communication. The distinctive beep signaled urgent messages, code activations, and critical patient updates across hospital floors. These devices became so embedded in clinical culture that they seemed irreplaceable. 

But in 2026, do hospitals still use pagers? What was once essential infrastructure is now a source of delays, inefficiencies, and patient safety risks. While some facilities still maintain pager systems, the majority of modern hospitals are actively phasing them out in favor of modern clinical communication platforms that address the complex, fast-paced demands of contemporary healthcare.

‍

Why Hospitals Used Pagers for Decades

There are several reasons why pagers have persisted in hospitals for decades. Pagers operated on dedicated radio frequencies that penetrated buildings far more effectively than early cellular signals. In hospitals with thick concrete walls, underground areas, and radiation-shielded rooms, pagers continued working, making them a reliable option before cell service had become as powerful as it is today. 

Battery life was another significant advantage as pagers could run for weeks on a single battery. For on-call physicians working long shifts or responding to emergencies at any hour, this reliability meant one less thing to worry about. Perhaps most importantly, pagers also functioned during major emergencies and network outages. When disasters overwhelmed cell networks or power failures disrupted hospital systems, pager networks often continued operating because they ran on separate infrastructure with battery backup.

The infrastructure was also relatively simple. Hospitals invested heavily in paging networks and switchboard operations designed around this technology. The system worked through established processes: a nurse called the switchboard, an operator paged the appropriate physician, and the physician called back to receive details. This workflow became deeply embedded in hospital operations.

These advantages made sense until the 1990s and early 2000s, before there was a viable alternative. Even into the 2000s, WiFi networks were unreliable, smartphones were in their infancy, and electronic health records were just beginning to emerge. In that context, pagers represented a practical solution to clinical communication challenges.

Fast forward to today, healthcare has evolved dramatically. WiFi infrastructure is now robust and ubiquitous, while smartphones have become exponentially more capable. Clinical workflows have also grown more complex, requiring rich contextual information that pagers simply cannot deliver. The advantages that once justified pagers no longer outweigh their significant limitations. 

‍

The Problem With Pagers in 2026: Delays, Fragmentation & Risk

In modern clinical environments, pagers not only fail to keep pace with evolving needs, but they actively create barriers to effective care. Poor communication can lead to medical errors, and outdated paging systems can contribute significantly to these failures.

• Pagers don’t confirm delivery or receipt: When a switchboard operator sends a page, there’s no way to know whether it reached the intended recipient. The pager might be out of range, turned off, or experiencing technical issues. This lack of confirmation creates dangerous uncertainty during time-sensitive situations and can leave coordinators in the dark about whether emergency response teams are actually mobilizing.
• No audit trail creates patient safety risks: Pager communications leave no permanent record. There’s no way to verify what information was communicated or if it was received. This absence of documentation creates compliance concerns and makes it nearly impossible to investigate communication failures after adverse events. When questions arise about whether critical lab results were communicated or code teams were properly activated, hospitals relying on pagers have no objective evidence to review. This lack of accountability exposes both patients and institutions to unnecessary risk.
• Switchboard dependency adds critical minutes: Most pager-based workflows require nurses or clinicians to call a central switchboard and wait while operators manually page the appropriate provider. This process causes significant delays, as messages are not instantly received. During emergencies, when every second affects patient outcomes, these delays can prove catastrophic. 
• No clinical context means delayed decisions: Pagers transmit minimal information –  typically just a callback number or a brief message within severe character limits. When a trauma team is activated, they do not get information such as arrival time or patient details that may be critical in preparing for the patient. In emergency situations where informed decision-making can mean the difference between life and death, this information gap has real consequences.
• Delayed or missed emergency code activations: Traditional pager-based code activation systems rely on sequential communication. The switchboard operator pages one team member, waits for confirmation, then pages the next. This creates a series of potential delays as each notification requires separate manual action. Research demonstrates these delays have measurable impacts: smartphone-based emergency notification systems can help cardiac response teams reach patients one minute faster than traditional operator-generated alerts. Another study found that smartphone notifications reached code teams 78 seconds before overhead pages, a difference that can prove decisive in cardiac arrest scenarios.

‍

Are Pagers HIPAA-Compliant?

As hospitals focus increasingly on patient privacy and regulatory compliance, a critical question emerges: are pagers actually HIPAA-compliant? The answer for most standard paging systems is no. Below are the reasons why pagers aren’t compliant with healthcare standards: 

• No encryption: Traditional pagers transmit messages as unencrypted radio signals. Anyone with appropriate radio equipment can intercept and read these communications. When those messages contain patient information – even seemingly innocuous details like “Call about Mrs. Smith in room 312” – they constitute a HIPAA violation. The radio frequencies used by pagers are not secure channels, and there’s no technical barrier preventing unauthorized access to these transmissions.
• No access controls: Pagers lack user authentication mechanisms. There’s no password protection, biometric verification, or secure login required to access messages. If a pager is lost, stolen, or simply left unattended, anyone who picks it up can read all stored messages.
• No audit logs: HIPAA requires covered entities to maintain records of who accessed PHI, when they accessed it, and what actions they took. Pagers cannot generate audit logs. There’s no way to track which clinicians viewed which messages, whether unauthorized individuals accessed patient information, or what happened to data after transmission. This absence of audit trails makes it impossible to demonstrate HIPAA compliance or investigate potential breaches.

‍

What Hospitals Use Instead of Pagers Today

Modern hospitals are replacing pagers with comprehensive clinical communication platforms that address the limitations of legacy systems while providing capabilities that pagers never could. These modern alternatives don’t just replicate pager functionality on smartphones, and instead reimagine how clinical teams coordinate care.

‍

1. Secure messaging apps 

Clinical communication platforms like Hypercare provide HIPAA-compliant messaging that goes beyond basic texts. Clinicians can share images, lab results, EKGs, and other clinical data securely, with full encryption and comprehensive audit trails. 

Messages confirm delivery and receipt, eliminating the uncertainty inherent in pager communications. Unlike consumer messaging apps that weren’t designed for healthcare, these purpose-built platforms ensure compliance while enabling the rich information exchange that complex clinical scenarios require.

‍

2. Mobile-based virtual pagers 

Rather than carrying separate physical devices, clinicians use smartphone apps that replicate pager functionality while adding critical enhancements. Modern pager replacpement solutions act as an all-in-one pager and answering service. With Hypercare, for example, clinical teams can assign dedicated numbers to specific providers, allowing callers to leave a call-back number and voicemail that is sent directly to the app. Unlike traditional pagers, mobile-based paging solutions offer multiple paging types such as individual paging, on-call team paging, and code team paging, which are conveniently sent directly to clinicians’ phones. 

Virtual pagers can also override Do Not Disturb settings for urgent messages, ensuring time-sensitive alerts reach recipients even when phones are silenced. They also provide delivery confirmation, allow for two-way communication, and integrate seamlessly with other clinical tools – all while maintaining the always-reachable reliability that made traditional pagers valuable.

‍

3. Role-based messaging

Modern platforms automatically route messages based on clinical roles and current assignments rather than requiring manual lookups. When a nurse needs to contact the on-call cardiologist, the system identifies and reaches the right provider based on real-time scheduling data. This eliminates the switchboard bottleneck, reduces misrouted messages, and ensures critical communications reach appropriate clinicians without delay.

‍

4. Automated code activations

Instead of relying on traditional switchboard workflows that require operators to manually page team members, advanced platforms activate entire code teams simultaneously with a single action. When a code blue is called, the system instantly notifies the emergency physician, respiratory therapist, ICU nurse, and all other designated responders, delivering critical patient context alongside the alert. This automation dramatically reduces response times while ensuring comprehensive team mobilization.

‍

5. On-call scheduling integration

By connecting directly with scheduling systems, modern communication platforms maintain always-current information about which providers are on call, when shifts change, and who should receive different types of messages. This real-time, on-call integration prevents the communication failures that occur when pager directories lag behind actual scheduling changes, ensuring urgent messages consistently reach the right person regardless of shift transitions or last-minute coverage changes.

‍

6. Real-time escalations

When primary contacts don’t acknowledge urgent messages within predetermined timeframes, modern systems automatically escalate to backup providers. This built-in redundancy ensures that communication failures don’t prevent patient care. For example, if the on-call interventional cardiologist doesn’t respond to a STEMI alert within 60 seconds, the system can immediately route to a secondary provider, maintaining continuous pathways to care even when individual clinicians are unavailable.

These capabilities represent fundamental improvements over pager-based workflows. They make communication faster, more reliable, more accountable, more secure, and more aligned with how modern clinical care actually functions. 

‍

How Pagers Fail During Emergency Code Activations

Nowhere do the limitations of pager-based systems become more apparent than during emergency code activations. When patients experience cardiac arrest, stroke, or other life-threatening events, communication infrastructure becomes critical to survival. 

Research shows that each minute of delay from cardiac arrest to CPR initiation corresponds to a 10% decrease in the likelihood of survival. Additionally, studies show mortality rates of 3.0% for door-to-balloon times under 90 minutes, rising to 4.2% for 91-120 minutes, 5.7% for 121-150 minutes, and 7.4% for times exceeding 150 minutes. In these time-critical moments, smartphones have proven to be more effective than traditional paging systems. One hospital study revealed that code teams responded to emergencies one minute faster when the code was activated through smartphone notifications instead of pager alerts and overheard paging. 

When pager-based communication systems introduce even two- to three-minute delays, the effects on survival become statistically significant and clinically devastating.

Below are several ways in which pagers consistently fail to meet these demands.

• No confirmation a page was received: When a code blue is activated and the switchboard pages the response team, there’s no way to know whether team members received the alert. A physician might be in an MRI room where pagers don’t work, in an elevator between floors, or simply out of range. Meanwhile, seconds tick by as coordinators wait uncertainly, unsure whether to escalate, re-page, or pursue alternative contact methods. This uncertainty creates dangerous delays when clarity and speed matter most.
• One-way communication prevents dialogue and context sharing: Pagers transmit information unidirectionally. When a provider receives a page, they cannot ask questions, share their current status, or coordinate with other responders. This lack of two-way communication forces clinicians to make decisions with incomplete information and prevents the dynamic coordination that complex emergencies require.
• No visibility into who else was paged: Pager-based activations provide no visibility into team assembly. A physician arriving at a code doesn’t know whether the respiratory therapist has been notified, when the ICU team might arrive, or if backup has been called. This lack of situational awareness complicates coordination and can lead to gaps in coverage when clinicians assume others are responding who actually never received the page.
• Sequential paging wastes critical minutes: Traditional workflows often require operators to page team members one at a time. Each page requires separate manual action, introducing cumulative delays. For example, one hospital decreased emergency activation response times from 20 minutes to five seconds after implementing real-time scheduling, messaging, and emergency surgical activation workflows. This dramatic difference reflects the inefficiency of sequential manual processes compared to automated simultaneous notification.
• Lack of patient context delays critical decision-making: When code teams arrive at a patient’s bedside without advance information about the patient’s baseline status, ongoing treatments, or relevant medical history, they waste valuable time gathering context rather than providing care. A trauma team leader benefits enormously from knowing the mechanism of injury, injury pattern and vital signs before arrival, allowing them to prepare mentally and gather appropriate resources en route. Pagers provide none of this context, forcing clinicians to arrive blind and play catch-up while the patient’s condition deteriorates.
• Technology reliability issues: Despite pagers’ reputation for reliability, the technology is far from infallible. Research has found that devices using pathways outside the hospital’s local network experienced delays exceeding 100 seconds in up to 33% of messages, indicating that the biggest influence on transmission reliability was the network used. Modern smartphones with multiple backup notification methods – push notifications, SMS, phone calls – provide more robust redundancy than pagers ever could.

‍

How Hospitals Can Transition Away From Pagers

Moving away from pagers doesn’t require disruption of clinical operations. Successful hospitals follow a structured approach that minimizes risk while accelerating adoption.

1. Audit current communication workflows: Start by auditing current communication workflows to understand exactly how pagers are being used, who relies on them, and what information flows through pager-based processes. Document every touchpoint where pagers play a role, from routine consults to emergency activations.
2. Identify pager-dependent processes: Next, identify pager-dependent processes and map them to modern alternatives. This clarifies which workflows need redesign versus simple technology replacement.
3. Implement a unified clinical communication platform: A communication and coordination platform that enables pager replacement addresses your clinical team’s specific needs. Look for solutions that integrate scheduling, secure messaging, and code activation in a single interface rather than creating new silos.
4. Start with a pilot: Consider beginning with a pilot in high-value departments like the emergency department, ICU, or cardiology where communication failures have the most significant impact. These pilots build confidence and generate data that supports broader rollout.
5. Migrate all codes to automated activation: Migrate all code activations to automated workflows, eliminating switchboard dependency and sequential paging. This delivers immediate, measurable improvements in emergency response times.
6. Decommission pagers gradually: Finally, decommission pagers gradually as adoption solidifies, ensuring backup communication pathways remain available during the transition.

‍

Why Hypercare Is Becoming the Pager Replacement Standard

Healthcare organizations choosing to move away from pagers increasingly select Hypercare as their pager replacement solution because it addresses the complete spectrum of clinical communication needs in a single, unified solution.

Hypercare’s unified communication platform consolidates secure messaging, on-call scheduling, and code team activation into one interface, eliminating the fragmentation that multiple point solutions create. Clinicians can share rich clinical context alongside urgent messages, transmitting EKGs, lab results, images, and patient information securely rather than relying on callback numbers alone.

The platform has been proven successful across multi-site hospital implementations, with organizations like Health Sciences North successfully replacing hundreds of legacy pagers with Hypercare. Fast onboarding and clinician-friendly user experience design ensure high adoption rates without extensive training requirements.

Mobile-first architecture means clinicians access everything they need from smartphones they already carry, while zero switchboard dependence eliminates bottlenecks that plague traditional pager workflows. Reliable escalation logic automatically routes messages to backup providers when primary contacts don’t respond, ensuring critical communications never fall through gaps.

‍

Key Takeaways

Yes, some hospitals still use pagers in 2026, but the momentum toward modern alternatives is accelerating rapidly. Healthcare leaders recognize that maintaining outdated communication infrastructure such as pagers puts patients at risk and creates operational inefficiencies that modern solutions eliminate.

Modern, secure smartphone-based clinical communication platforms have become the new standard for hospitals seeking to improve care coordination. These solutions don’t just replace pagers, but also improve how clinical teams work together, providing the speed, context, and reliability that complex care demands.

To learn more about how Hypercare transforms clinical communication and replaces legacy pager systems with modern, integrated solutions, book a demo.